Fallout 4
0 of 0

File information

Last updated

Original upload

Created by

Glitchfinder

Uploaded by

Glitchfinder

Virus scan

Safe to use

76 comments

  1. Glitchfinder
    Glitchfinder
    • premium
    • 705 kudos
    Locked
    Sticky
    Mod Compatibility Post

    I'll list mods that people ask about here, along with their patch status.


    Compatible Mods:
    The mods listed below are already compatible with Random Encounter Framework, and thus do not need patching. This is typically because they either implement their own spawning or NPC handling (like SKK Combat Stalkers), or place NPCs or encounters directly into the world rather than using random encounters.


    Patched Mods:


    If you're curious about a mod not listed here, feel free to ask and I can look into it.
  2. bobby1993
    bobby1993
    • member
    • 0 kudos
    The Fens Sheriff's Department's random encounter patch needs a Random encounter framework patch of its own. I'm dead lmao. Thought for sure I was misreading it. Thanks for the patch's patch
  3. Pakuska1
    Pakuska1
    • premium
    • 0 kudos
    You are such a gigachad. Not only did you make 290 random encounters, and a entire framework for other people to use. you go out of your way to make sure other mods are compatible with it.
    1. JayDeli
      JayDeli
      • member
      • 3 kudos
      i totally agree, thanks for the work Glitchfinder
  4. 4estGimp
    4estGimp
    • premium
    • 611 kudos
    How are the conflicting Story Manager Quest Node records not an issue when multiple patches are installed?  What trickery handles this?
    1. Battlestar1965
      Battlestar1965
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      ....Sorry....had to delete all i wrote because i just found the answers
    2. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      The only conflicting nodes you should see when multiple patches are installed are forwarded from Random Encounter Framework. All I did with most patches in this hub is excise the new encounters into their own nodes, followed by updating the node the patched mod edited to reflect how Random Encounter Framework set it up.

      The exceptions are mods that made actual mechanical changes to existing story manager nodes, and those patches are clearly labeled with instructions to load them last. For that grouping of patches, there are actual conflicts and I can provide combined patches upon request.
    3. 4estGimp
      4estGimp
      • premium
      • 611 kudos
      As luck would have it I'm running both Deacreased Automatron BS and GCM.  That win will probably get handled by load order in favor or the Automatron BS mod.

      FSD, and Sector V have new quests within Nodes RETravelQuests and REChokepointQuests.
      Sector V adds one Quest to node REAssaultQuests, RETravelQuestsUrban, and REChokepointQuestUrban
      Sector V and Rust Devils both add a Quest to REAssaultQuestUrban
      FSD has some similar things happening.

      I see those Nodes get a new <RE....Parent>.  However, the new Quests mentioned above are not used in the REPatches.  That's the part I don't understand.  Would those additional quests need to be manually merged?
    4. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      I just redownloaded both mods and double-checked the patches to be sure, and at this point I have no idea what you're seeing. Both mods add new random encounter quests to the existing story manager nodes. I moved those quests to new story manager nodes and reverted the original nodes to match REF. Because the new nodes are parented to REF, they will be picked at random when random encounters are needed.

      This makes a lot more sense when you're looking at the story manager in the Creation Kit rather than in xedit:
      
      That said, I will admit that I missed a wild edit in one of the FSD updates and have updated the patch to fix its ITM conflict with the checkpoint init node. As for GCM versus Rust Devils Redux, sadly that looks like one of the rare cases where a patch is impossible to make at the conceptual level. So you either get to pick the ability to personally adjust the rarity, or you get to pick hand-adjusted rarity (which I re-adjusted to match REF's changes).
    5. 4estGimp
      4estGimp
      • premium
      • 611 kudos
      Yep.  xEdit does not give that kind of view at all.  TY for the explanations.  I'll just drop the GCM patch in favor of the No Automatron BS patch.  The remaining patches I use are good to go.

      Thanks for a year of work on this mod and a stupid number of patches.
    6. Masterlix1982
      Masterlix1982
      • premium
      • 139 kudos
      Im glad this is/has been discussed. So tl;dr - these xedit conflicts are addressed by the framework's story manager quest nodes & all therefore can occur? If I have my xedit hat on & wanted all to occur ingame I'd forward all to a patch so we're saying this isn't necessary?

      example here.
    7. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      Correct. The purpose of the patches in this repository is to alter mods that used the story manager as it was so that they instead use random encounter framework. This allows them to be patched individually rather than requiring a custom patch for every combination of mods that adds random encounters. Part of that process is reverting any changes made to story manager quest nodes that are also edited by Random Encounter Framework, so that Random Encounter Framework can continue doing what it was designed to do.
  5. BossDaddyD
    BossDaddyD
    • member
    • 13 kudos
    Hi a new series of faction overhauls from Warsaw2135 Improved Hostile Factions just came up lately and it's also implementing some encounters does this need a patch from REF?
    1. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      They do not need patches. Warsaw2135 makes use of Random Encounter Framework to add the encounters, which means it's already compatible by default.
    2. BossDaddyD
      BossDaddyD
      • member
      • 13 kudos
      Thank you for the clarification
  6. chubjub
    chubjub
    • supporter
    • 5 kudos
    Hi, could you have a look at the mod FNAF: Animatronic Apocalypse  https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/76764, if you have the time?
    I look at it using F04Edit and believe it would need a patch to work with this framework.

    Thankyou.
    1. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      You are correct. I've uploaded a patch and updated the compatibility list.
    2. chubjub
      chubjub
      • supporter
      • 5 kudos
      Nice one thankyou
  7. condemnedcatbiceps
    condemnedcatbiceps
    • member
    • 0 kudos
    nm, figured it out
  8. ByteSix
    ByteSix
    • member
    • 8 kudos
    Could you take a look at Simple Bounties ?
    1. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      Looks to already be compatible, because it implements its own standalone system. I've added it to the compatibility post.
    2. ByteSix
      ByteSix
      • member
      • 8 kudos
      Thank you, much appreciated.
  9. BigBozat
    BigBozat
    • member
    • 13 kudos
    *Tips hat*  << for the latest GCM patch
    Thanks!
    1. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      It's worth noting that, while that global variable is a flat percent chance to see automatron encounters in the base game, the changes made by Random Encounter Framework mean that the actual chance of seeing the encounters will be significantly less than the value set by that global. I wrote up a more detailed explanation here.
    2. BigBozat
      BigBozat
      • member
      • 13 kudos
      Thanks for the additional insight.  Good to know. 
      *more fervent hat-tipping activity*

    3. chubjub
      chubjub
      • supporter
      • 5 kudos
      I'm pretty sure Random Encounter Manager by SKK has a variable adjustment for automatron encounters as well should be left as the default valve then? or have I miss understood.
    4. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      I would have to check, but there's a good chance that it would use the same variable, and would follow the same rules if it does. I know for a fact that SKK's manager doesn't add any new variables, so if it has a controller like that then the same patch will work for both.
    5. BigBozat
      BigBozat
      • member
      • 13 kudos
      edit:  nvm  (lol)
  10. BigBozat
    BigBozat
    • member
    • 13 kudos
    So, with your Random Encounter Framework now included in the new FATE fix/gameplay mod, I'm assuming these will be obsolete/not usable until a similar patch hub referencing FATE gets made?
    1. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      I have mixed feelings on that, and I think XKCD summed up why quite well:

      
      The short version is that the only thing merging this framework into FATE accomplishes is create a competing standard. For a framework centered around making things more compatible, creating an alternative master that is also broadly incompatible not only defeats the purpose, but is going in the opposite direction instead.

      I have multiple mods in the works that use this framework. I will not be converting them to use FATE, because the conversion process is not a simple change in master file name and FATE is not a mod I would personally use.

      Poet includes a select few of the patches from this hub as an optional file for FATE, and deliberately ignored the rest. That means that anyone who wants the other patches would need a third party to convert or make new patches for FATE, and those patches would not be inter-compatible with patches made for Random Encounter Framework. Similarly, mods that utilize the framework will not be compatible with FATE unless converted (via esp replacer, no less), and mods that utilize the framework merged into FATE are incompatible with the standalone framework.

      Every other one of my mods that got included, I've already updated the relevant compatibility posts to mention that they are redundant with FATE installed. Random Encounter Framework is not redundant with FATE installed, and for technical reasons involved with being a master, it never will be.
    2. BigBozat
      BigBozat
      • member
      • 13 kudos
      I snorted when I saw your/XKCD standards meme... true.  
      I need a suitable Aaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrggh! meme for response.

      Tho your feelings don't seem all that mixed, to me. 

      I guess I don't understand Poet's motivation, purpose or design intent... why try to roll up REF into something that's gonna invalidate all the existing REF work product & infrastructure?

      ... and wish I understood this particular implication b4 I went thru the tedious process of installing FATE and removing all the stuff I had that conflicted/was redundant (but, Im an idiot, so par for the course).
      I really need that arrgh meme now.
    3. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      Ah, my feelings aren't mixed because of the result. They're mixed because I deliberately left the permissions for this mod wide open, with no stipulations on use or modification. I won't change those permissions either, since that is important for a framework like this. However, leaving the permissions like that is what allows a mod like this to be entirely subsumed into a larger mod, even if it runs counter to the goal.
    4. BossDaddyD
      BossDaddyD
      • member
      • 13 kudos
      Not all people likes what FATE has implemented so kudos to you Glitchfinder for standing up on what you have started from the beggining.
    5. BigBozat
      BigBozat
      • member
      • 13 kudos
      fwiw:  FATE's dropping it's REM element, so one fewer standard soon... gave a second thought.
  11. Paspartan1
    Paspartan1
    • premium
    • 4 kudos
    I think that Capital Wasteland Auto Axe also adds random encounters.
    1. Glitchfinder
      Glitchfinder
      • premium
      • 705 kudos
      You are correct. I've uploaded a patch and updated the compatibility post accordingly.
    2. Paspartan1
      Paspartan1
      • premium
      • 4 kudos
      Nice, thanks!