Blunt would make sense, but unfortunately he made it a Blade. The description that it's "slightly better than a fine steel claymore and slightly worse than a silver claymore" is also not accurate. Weight, health and damage are slightly better than a DWARVEN claymore and slightly worse than an ELVEN claymore. The value is between silver and dwarven. The speed is slower than a warhammer and the reach is between a longsword and a battleaxe. I have no idea why any of that made sense. If it's described as between fine steel and silver, then it should BE between fine steel and silver. I could see slower than a warhammer if it had greater reach, but I just don't understand making it slower with shorter reach. It's the slowest and shortest two handed weapon in the game if you use it; you'd be better off using a comparable vanilla claymore or battleaxe. All of this can be changed in the CS, of course, but it's weird that you have to. It is really nice looking though.
Very nice looking weapon but massively under powered. It should be 35 damage. The Halberd is a slow weapon that packs a hell of a whack. Being so slow it has to have a big damage value to compensate otherwise it would be too limiting to be worth using. In other games it's powered slightly higher than a Warhammer. Your Halberd would be outstanding at 35 damage. That's my only gripe, but I have to say that the quality of the modeling of the Halberd is superb.
Give Feedback
10 comments
if he hits it looks weird to me but it'll do
P.S. glass halberd is already done!
Good job Phitt
10/10