File information

Last updated

Original upload

Created by

Putteqla

Uploaded by

Putteqla

Virus scan

Safe to use

61 comments

  1. IM3KONI
    IM3KONI
    • supporter
    • 10 kudos
    Hi, sorry to be that guy, but I am getting an error, I have all the required mods installed, I followed your instructions, copying the PRS 3.1 file to starfield root, installed Reshade and loaded your ini, then once installed I copied the shaders folder across overwriting the existing shaders installed (I presume that was the correct thing to do).

    This is what it looks like once the game loads.
    Any help on what I have done wrong would be appreciated. 

    Thanks
  2. MkHaters
    MkHaters
    • premium
    • 5 kudos
    can you please clarify step 3 for hdr users, my screen looks different than what you have screenshotted
    1. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      y o! Have you copies the settings as shown in the picture? It's important to turn of Generic Depth and enable everything else. Try restart the game :)

      Edit: I've updated the guide on the page! Try out OpenDRT for best possible HDR quality.
    2. MkHaters
      MkHaters
      • premium
      • 5 kudos
      i was refering to before your page update thanks bro bro

      :edit: giving ya kudos for just being dope
    3. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      Haha np man! 

      Kudos for kudos my friend, have a nice day :)
  3. FactualCharacter
    FactualCharacter
    • supporter
    • 4 kudos
    At least for those using gravity LUT or stellar LUT, this appears to be a downgrade due to excessive contrast. It puts pitch black darkness in places that should be only lightly obscured by shadow.
    1. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      There are 3 presets with 3 different gamma/black curves.
      Which one have you tried?
      Did you try it with SDR or HDR?
      Which versions of the LUTs mentioned have you tried? 

      The primary goal of this reshade is too correct certain cons of each outputs. I have not looked into Gravity LUT or Stellar LUT because they change the games gradients a lot and already is ''reshaded''. They should not need a reshade because the goal of the LUT is to create an artistic look.

      You could try PRS 1.0 or 1.3. Those should be compatible with Gravity.
  4. Elum302
    Elum302
    • member
    • 9 kudos
    I was replaying cyberpunk 2077 and I was looking for a reshade preset when I noticed that 2077 also had a lot of "green" but I couldn't find a preset I liked, then I took the plunge and tried this Starfield reshade, unbelievable, perfect compatibility.
    Thanks again. 
    Imgsli
    _____
    Imgsli
    1. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      Wow That actually looks awesome haha. Thanks for your support <3
  5. Krenum
    Krenum
    • member
    • 3 kudos
    Incredible reshade.

    Feels like a new game.
  6. sufjansam273
    sufjansam273
    • premium
    • 0 kudos
    this is still my favorite reshade, been using PRS 1.3 No Green this whole time. it does wonders on nearly everything, but especially faces. it pairs quite nicely with NaturalLUTs Enhanced, too, for what it's worth.
    1. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      Awesome! Glad you like it :) Let me know if there's anything that I can do to improve it. 
  7. ArchieNovalis
    ArchieNovalis
    • member
    • 1 kudos
    odd artifacts and film grain caused by RESHADE. is there a fix?
    (in-game film grain is turned off)

    https://i.imgur.com/JBPfxZ1.png
    1. Sephrajin
      Sephrajin
      • premium
      • 207 kudos
      Maybe its me, still having the effects from PSR 1.0... but...are you sure you've changed your addons / effects?
    2. Sephrajin
      Sephrajin
      • premium
      • 207 kudos
      Err.. guess i'm saying:
      try disabling "unsharp" ?
    3. ArchieNovalis
      ArchieNovalis
      • member
      • 1 kudos
      i disabled DELC_Sharpen and it got rid of most of the artifacts
    4. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      I've had this problem myself and I don't exactly know what's causing it, seems to be an issue with the shaders itself. I think I renamed the ini file and restarted starfield with the new preset. I think it's DELC sharpen that's causing the weird grain issue.

      If that doesn't work then try disable all the shaders im using, restart starfield and enable all of them when your in game.
  8. Sephrajin
    Sephrajin
    • premium
    • 207 kudos
    What is the difference between "punch" and "smooth" please?
    That would be a nice "feature" to add to the changelog ;)

    Thank you

    EDIT:
    In your screenshots (New Altantis with Andreja), the only difference I see is minimal change in the.... rose/pink sky...

    EDIT 2:
    Seems I have overseen the first line in the files, because my eyes had just blended out those "if you already installed ...." 
    1. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      Punch has slightly brighter highlights than smooth. More ''exciting'' preset :D

      Check out my new reshade!
    2. Sephrajin
      Sephrajin
      • premium
      • 207 kudos
      Yeah :)
      I just wanted to submit a video to your page using PSR 2.0, but seems I can only add it to "starfield" in general, not to your mod :(
    3. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      That's weird! It should work without my permission :O
    4. Sephrajin
      Sephrajin
      • premium
      • 207 kudos
      When i "follow the link" that is on your video-tab visible, providing a video, creates one.. there..
      https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/videos/703

      idk...

      If you like it, feel free to add it "as your own".
      Direct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=plio2X-atRQ
    5. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      Nice man, I'll add it :D
  9. Elum302
    Elum302
    • member
    • 9 kudos
    It's incredible that 2.0 is about to be released and I'm still reeling from the amazing enhancements of 1.3. 
    1. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      It's available! :)
    2. Elum302
      Elum302
      • member
      • 9 kudos
      I tested it briefly at New Atlantis and I honestly prefer 1.3 shadows for now, as 2.0 might be a bit too blue. The 2.0 at sunlight is too bright for me. This is just a preliminary conclusion based on my personal tastes, and I'll continue to test. 
      2.0 vs. 1.3 vs. vanilla
      
      2.0 vs. 1.3 vs. vanilla (2)
      ————————————————————
      22:34 I repeatedly switched convinced that version 2.0 was a few frames lower than version 1.3. I also seem to be experiencing stuttering issues that are hard to replicate.
    3. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      Hello! You're still using Gravity LUT right? Try adjusting this setting :) 
      You can adjust the tint there as well, right next to global temp.

      Lightroom - global temp

      Comparison: Starfiled hue temp - Imgsli
    4. Elum302
      Elum302
      • member
      • 9 kudos
       Thanks, I do still use the Gravity LUT, at the moment it's still beta may have issues as well, I'll try other LUTs.

      After adjusting according to your method, the shadow performance can indeed recover to my favorite 1.3. Thank you again.

      PRS2.0 is still experiencing lower framerates for me at the moment.
      New Atlantis: 57FPS (vanilla) >54FPS (PRS1.3) >50FPS (PRS2.0).

      I feel that the color of 2.0 is more saturated and the public should like it better.

      I will continue to test 2.0 to provide more feedback.

      (All of the above are from translation software)
    5. Sephrajin
      Sephrajin
      • premium
      • 207 kudos
      For your own sanity, stick to neutral and gravity luts. (or just any one or two)
      The more (different luts) you try to "implement" (make it work with), the more obsticles you put yourself in the way.
    6. Elum302
      Elum302
      • member
      • 9 kudos
      Ok, I will recommend that players who are similar to me use prs1.3 and Gravity lut.For better performance and reality, the shadow of walking in the sun on the cement pavement is almost the feeling of gray with a little green.
      【See my screenshot uploaded to the media or the link above.】
      (from translation)
  10. NebiIim
    NebiIim
    • member
    • 0 kudos
    I agree with you. Most of the time, video games have unrealistic coloration (too many colors). We don't really notice it, but in reality, the world is duller. Until now, I've been using NaturaLUTs with Rudy ReShade. I just tried your ReShade, and I must admit that I find it more realistic. I'll edit my message later after I've played around with your ReShade a bit more to give a cooler opinion, as I'm reacting in the moment right after installing your ReShade.
    1. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      Glad you like it! Be sure to give me feedback when you got the time. Have fun playing!
    2. NebiIim
      NebiIim
      • member
      • 0 kudos
      I'm coming back to give a definitive opinion, I have totally adopted it. I tried version 1.2 and Vivid, I did not appreciate Vivid which was too bright in color, as for version 1.2, well, I was not able to see a visual difference with version 1.0 (my eyes are perhaps tired, or the change is too subtle, tested on Neon).

      I saw a person talk about Gravity LUT, I tried it on my side and I found it much too dark, with the same flaw that I systematically have with Gravity, that is to say a too significant bloom effect. Tested in 1.0 before the release of 1.2 and Vivid.

      I want to thank the author for his work.
    3. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      What a great feedback! Thank you and I'm glad you like it :)

      Difference between 1.0 and 1.2 is very subtle indeed, just a few very small hue, gamma, bloom and contrast changes.
      I agree about vivid, tho I made it for people who don't bump up the colors on their hardware/screen :)

      If people request a gravity version then I'm up for it!

      Thank you again.
    4. RedDog6911
      RedDog6911
      • member
      • 45 kudos
      How about a Stellar LUT version? While I did like Gravity, I found that it didn't really feel right when every planet had very Earth like lighting, regardless of the type of star the planet was orbiting. Stellar LUT on the other hand just feels better for exoplanets in my opinion.
    5. Elum302
      Elum302
      • member
      • 9 kudos
      I agree with you guys, the gravitational LUT is indeed too grey in some ways, it also kills a lot of the stellar signature light, and I'm looking forward to that author's continued optimization. As for the stellar LUT, I haven't tried it yet, and some people have commented that they prefer the latter. 
    6. Putteqla
      Putteqla
      • premium
      • 8 kudos
      Sure I'll check it out!