Excelent! Though not installing, because i'm stubborn and i'm using "with notes"... to write my map all down. xD ... and its all about the " map.swf "... With notes from LE ported and no alternative for SE ... >_<" Agree, those icons could be a smaller, specially that their collision makes you "create a marker vanilla" most of the time, without intention, or when you want to mark a point to go, close to a given marker, also cant, because the static ones are too big. But...since is "map.swf" ...could be a good upgrade... reduce the discovery_markers, but keeping the buff of 'with notes, alteration spell", in a 5.2 map.swf... wow, a dream! O_O
Answering my own question, apparently not. And unfortunately it seems that this 50% reduction breaks the internal / local maps. I'm here wondering if it's worth it... I'll try the 75% to see if it alleviates the problem.
47 comments
Though not installing, because i'm stubborn and i'm using "with notes"... to write my map all down. xD ... and its all about the " map.swf "... With notes from LE ported and no alternative for SE ... >_<"
Agree, those icons could be a smaller, specially that their collision makes you "create a marker vanilla" most of the time, without intention, or when you want to mark a point to go, close to a given marker, also cant, because the static ones are too big.
But...since is "map.swf" ...could be a good upgrade... reduce the discovery_markers, but keeping the buff of 'with notes, alteration spell", in a 5.2 map.swf... wow, a dream! O_O
I'll try the 75% to see if it alleviates the problem.