Best sack retexture. Don't see how you could improve it, though 8192 would be sweet.
Also, something I have yet to see is a large chest retexture, you know those ones at the dragon lairs. They look terrible. I would make textures myself but have no idea where to begin...
Best sack retexture. Don't see how you could improve it, though 8192 would be sweet.
Also, something I have yet to see is a large chest retexture, you know those ones at the dragon lairs. They look terrible. I would make textures myself but have no idea where to begin...
You'd need a LOT of VRAM if you were to use 8192x8192 textures everywhere, otherwise your PC would struggle hardcore.
I've only got 512mb VRAM and I installed a landscape texture pack and noticed a lot of stuttering. Granted, I can't run Skyrim perfectly smooth even without HD textures, but there's definitely a performance loss if you have limited VRAM.
And I've got 3GB of standard ram. I wouldn't mind having another gig but oh well, not much I can do about it.
@Nubblecakes different texture sizes doesnt really have that large of a impact on the performance if you have atleast 4gb ram. loadtimes would be a little longer though
28 comments
Also, something I have yet to see is a large chest retexture, you know those ones at the dragon lairs. They look terrible. I would make textures myself but have no idea where to begin...
EDIT: Ah man, double posted...
Also, something I have yet to see is a large chest retexture, you know those ones at the dragon lairs. They look terrible. I would make textures myself but have no idea where to begin...
I've only got 512mb VRAM and I installed a landscape texture pack and noticed a lot of stuttering. Granted, I can't run Skyrim perfectly smooth even without HD textures, but there's definitely a performance loss if you have limited VRAM.
And I've got 3GB of standard ram. I wouldn't mind having another gig but oh well, not much I can do about it.
Would even be more awesome
thank you