In case you're still unfamiliar with this plugin, the official summary: "LeFemm Armor, specially tailored for the ladies, is on sale at the Fighters Guild in Vivec, from Sirollus Saccus in Ebonheart, the Redoran Vaults, and the lady smiths in Ald-ruhn, Sadrith Mora, and Ald Velothi." For even more information, check the plugin's UESP page.

However, this plugin contained a bug in which Sirollus Saccus wouldn't sell the pieces of the armor to the player, because he equips them instead. True, a fix already exists, however while I agree with the necessity of the fix, I don't agree with the actual method. With all due respect, and no offense, but I just don't. (Removing the armor pieces from his inventory, and adding them into a separate container.) This mod instead of that, adds a second set into his inventory, (changes the number next to the pieces from -1 to -2) so this way he has his own set equipped AND sells a restocking (minus indicates a restocking amount in the Construction Set) set to the player.

Why?

- More choices for you. Elect either this mod, or the other one, or none. It's up to you.
- I think this was the developers' original intention: If they wanted to add the pieces into a container, they would have added it into a container (like in the case of the other smiths modifed by the mod -> Everyone besides Saccus has the pieces of the new armor(s) in a container).
- A more purist approach: The NPC is modified by the original plugin anyway (it also restores the missing training opportunity with him), so let's not modify the cell he's in too.

Yeah, but what about the fact that Sirollus is a man and the armor is for women? Doesn't that make invalid the part about the developers' intentions?

I would say that it can be stated with a relative confidence that it may have been intentional that they made him wear the armor. In the world of TES, such things are not taboo as much as in our world.

Credits:

Bethesda Softworks for the original plugin.