NGL this feels like a real spit in the face of Tim with how excellent of a job he did voicing Gale. The energy in his acting truly brought the character alive and this just takes the life right out of it.
Then go somewhere else man, this is literally a modification specifically meant for the audience who wants it. And you knowing you dislike this content came here specifically to be upset about it. Which is incredibly rude and inconsiderate. Just make a mental note that you dislike it and leave.
Stay off Nexus and just any mod site really if you don't like content that changes "the original work." That's what modding is. NGL maximum autism in these kinds of comments.
It's still using every single word he uttered during his many years of performance. And the change is so subtle that it entirely discredits this critique.
@AsraFantasy Other modification would not be about voice acting, and genderbending is the can of worms no mature person would want to open in public unless they're looking for another bout of tolerance vs intolerance drama (were you?, I wonder). You have a point with the part that (almost) anything can be disliked by someone, but you have to realise that no one can dislike everything. People have specific views and preferences and those, as a whole set, are (almost) uniquely theirs. OP apparently has a high opining about Gale's VO, but that doesn't mean they have to value the whole of Gale the same way.
@MochaTheVA They were neither rude nor inconsiderate. They shared their opinion and were perfectly polite about it. Definitely more so than you were.
@CrimsonNibbles How about if instead you just stay off the internet if you don't like what you called "Autism" in comments so much. If you're allowed to stay somewhere were you can potentially run into something you dislike and to subsequently complain about it then why shouldn't they be?
@Goonacles You can simply not reply to the OP. Isn't it f*#@ing crazy how you can just do that?
@ the whole witchunting mob Look guys, hate to break it to you, but mod content varies and so do people's values. OP is entitled to their own views and reactions and is no more obligated to keep them to themselves than you are obligated to keep yours to yourself. However unlike you they were sticking purely to discussing content yet you guys began discussing them. They just started a discussion (not in a praising manner, sure, but not every discussion has to contain praise), you guy were the ones who brought the actual toxicity to it. 5 replies to the op (before mine) and only 1 (namely misapheonix) actually had anything to say about the difference in content itself. Shame on the rest of you.
On the actual topic - I haven't played BG3 yet, but I've seen the demo video of this VO, and it's quite good for generated content, however it still IS generated content and voice acting in it is non-existent. This basically boils down the mod VS vanilla comparison to two question. 1 - were there any glaring issues with voice acting in original VO? and... 2 - how badly does each individual person dislike the original voice itself. (including it getting old for people with too many runs under the belt)
If you look at this mod's statistics the rest of the "story" more or less tells itself. Mod has nearly 5% endorsements to uDLs ratio. (Which is actually a very good user satisfaction ratio average seems to be around 1%, I think..., sorry if I'm off, those are largely eye-balled statistics) Hover the ammount of uDLs themselves is low. What the two together (high satisfaction + low user interest) mean is that this is a good mod but a niche one.
So, it would seem that OP wasn't too far off the mark, yet he still was overreacting.
Conclusion - it's a good mod to have, but specifically for those who don't like the original VO for whatever reason. Now, was something like that so hard to say WITHOUT telling the op how to lead their live? ... kids these days...
I should ? what will happen if I don't? why are you here anyway ? If I did have sampe will you give Endorsements ? Have you ever give Endorsements ? If you think you can do better, please do it, I'm sure it gonna be great
You shouldn't delete it, but do please upload a sample. Less than half of people will download your mod that were initially interested if they have no idea what they are actually receiving. It's the equivalent of downloading an NPC replacer with no model images, or an item mod with no pictures of the items. Thanks for creating this either way.
they still compaint about it after I did their request, I even PIN the update message. Since when the Post tab is more important than Decription tab ? Can I call them Haters now ? Seriously where are you when I posted mods that have video? now you see a mod with no video, you jump right in an give complaints. You gonna do more than that to provoke me, just to let you, now try Harder !
38 comments
@MochaTheVA
They were neither rude nor inconsiderate. They shared their opinion and were perfectly polite about it. Definitely more so than you were.
@CrimsonNibbles
How about if instead you just stay off the internet if you don't like what you called "Autism" in comments so much.
If you're allowed to stay somewhere were you can potentially run into something you dislike and to subsequently complain about it then why shouldn't they be?
@Goonacles
You can simply not reply to the OP. Isn't it f*#@ing crazy how you can just do that?
@ the whole witchunting mob
Look guys, hate to break it to you, but mod content varies and so do people's values.
OP is entitled to their own views and reactions and is no more obligated to keep them to themselves than you are obligated to keep yours to yourself.
However unlike you they were sticking purely to discussing content yet you guys began discussing them.
They just started a discussion (not in a praising manner, sure, but not every discussion has to contain praise), you guy were the ones who brought the actual toxicity to it.
5 replies to the op (before mine) and only 1 (namely misapheonix) actually had anything to say about the difference in content itself.
Shame on the rest of you.
On the actual topic - I haven't played BG3 yet, but I've seen the demo video of this VO, and it's quite good for generated content, however it still IS generated content and voice acting in it is non-existent. This basically boils down the mod VS vanilla comparison to two question.
1 - were there any glaring issues with voice acting in original VO? and...
2 - how badly does each individual person dislike the original voice itself. (including it getting old for people with too many runs under the belt)
If you look at this mod's statistics the rest of the "story" more or less tells itself.
Mod has nearly 5% endorsements to uDLs ratio. (Which is actually a very good user satisfaction ratio average seems to be around 1%, I think..., sorry if I'm off, those are largely eye-balled statistics)
Hover the ammount of uDLs themselves is low.
What the two together (high satisfaction + low user interest) mean is that this is a good mod but a niche one.
So, it would seem that OP wasn't too far off the mark, yet he still was overreacting.
Conclusion - it's a good mod to have, but specifically for those who don't like the original VO for whatever reason.
Now, was something like that so hard to say WITHOUT telling the op how to lead their live? ... kids these days...
It's such a good mod - please update it if you have the will and time ♥
edit - I managed to update this mod myself to patch 7 by following the quide by OneoftheKharites that they posted here!!!
Seriously where are you when I posted mods that have video? now you see a mod with no video, you jump right in an give complaints. You gonna do more than that to provoke me, just to let you, now try Harder !
I praise your ability to rile people up but I'm still not downloading your mod.