Am I the only one who plays this game that knows what real tundra is like? Look it up in wikipedia. It exists in cold, cold country where trees don't grow and often there is a layer of permafrost under the surface of the ground. Volcanic tundra is impossible.
Well it's in the game whether you like it or not. You should write a stern letter to Bethesda! And while you're at it, maybe you can demand they remove dragons, elves, magic, the entire cosmology (two moons?!), Daedric demons, gods, and everything else that doesn't line up with the real world.
You almost got me there with "Am i the only one that knows what real tundra is like" until you told us to look it up in Wikipedia. This must be a joke.
While the post OP made is uneccessary, especialy in relation to this mod, I must say that looking things up on Wikipedia is fine. Not anyone can read, understand or even find peer-reviewed papers on subjects outside their professional scope and in that case Wikipedia is fine.
It's fine even if you're doing a research and using as an search engine for sicentific literature.
Here are a few examples of references used in Wikipedia article about tundra:
- "The Tundra Biome". The World's Biomes. University of California, Berkeley. - "Tundra Biome". National Geographic - "The tundra biome". University of California Museum of Paleontology. - Higuera, Philip E.; Chipman, Melissa L.; Barnes, Jennifer L.; Urban, Michael A.; et al. (December 2011). "Variability of tundra fire regimes in Arctic Alaska: millennial-scale patterns and ecological implications". Ecological Applications. 21 (8): 3211–3226. - Longton, R.E. (1988). Biology of Polar Bryophytes and Lichen. Studies in Polar Research. Cambridge University Press. - Mack, Michelle C.; Bret-Harte, M. Syndonia; Hollingsworth, Teresa N.; Jandt, Randi R.; et al. (28 July 2011). "Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire". Nature. 475 (7357): 489–492.
Wikipedia is at it's worst about as acurate as anyother encyclopedia.
the idea was to make the water look wavy under the water. the heat wave effect looks perfect for that idea, or maybe even the effect that's used for the time wound, that was also transparent and wavy looking.
A: As long as a mod doesn't overwrite the same effect files as this, it'll be compatible with everything.
I checked cross referenced the two mods and FYX - Water Splash and this mod both use the "fxsplashlargechurn.nif" file, so probably not. You could try letting this overwrite FYX - Water Splash, I only use this mod so I don't know. Worth a try.
So you said this goes great with a mod that adds damage to the steam. What is a good mod that does that? I have never seen one that does that. Would like to check it out and try it with this mod. You have peaked my interest.
There was an old mod that would do this, there's a new version "Fires Hurt NG" that does it with SKSE plugin instead of scripting. I'm not 100% sure it adds damage to the volcanic water but worth a shot.
There is no objective answer to that. If you're running on a 15 year old laptop, having 2 extra rabbits on the screen could cause performance impact for you, but nobody else.
This simply adds the heatwave effect used in fires to the heat pools, so it's the same as having a fire on the screen.
Try it, if it causes problems, remove it, easy! :)
140 comments
https://www.nexusmods.com/skyrim/mods/96950
Same as fast travel, magic and dragons are impossible in our world, but pretty much standard in Skyrim.
If you are looking for realism, go play outside.
If you want to immerse yourself in a beautiful fantasy world, go play Skyrim.
Cheers
-=DD=-
Well it's in the game whether you like it or not. You should write a stern letter to Bethesda! And while you're at it, maybe you can demand they remove dragons, elves, magic, the entire cosmology (two moons?!), Daedric demons, gods, and everything else that doesn't line up with the real world.
I guess Iceland is impossible, but I've still been there.
It's fine even if you're doing a research and using as an search engine for sicentific literature.
Here are a few examples of references used in Wikipedia article about tundra:
- "The Tundra Biome". The World's Biomes. University of California, Berkeley.
- "Tundra Biome". National Geographic
- "The tundra biome". University of California Museum of Paleontology.
- Higuera, Philip E.; Chipman, Melissa L.; Barnes, Jennifer L.; Urban, Michael A.; et al. (December 2011). "Variability of tundra fire regimes in Arctic Alaska: millennial-scale patterns and ecological implications". Ecological Applications. 21 (8): 3211–3226.
- Longton, R.E. (1988). Biology of Polar Bryophytes and Lichen. Studies in Polar Research. Cambridge University Press.
- Mack, Michelle C.; Bret-Harte, M. Syndonia; Hollingsworth, Teresa N.; Jandt, Randi R.; et al. (28 July 2011). "Carbon loss from an unprecedented Arctic tundra wildfire". Nature. 475 (7357): 489–492.
Wikipedia is at it's worst about as acurate as anyother encyclopedia.
this is still so good
just let it overwrite all conflicts
makes the foam at the base of a waterfall all hazy too like the waterdrops in the air are refracting light
I use FYX - Water Splash - Water for ENB - WEBaRF, must overwrite or no?
This simply adds the heatwave effect used in fires to the heat pools, so it's the same as having a fire on the screen.
Try it, if it causes problems, remove it, easy! :)