An Update From Dark0ne

  • Comment
After almost 24 years of running Nexus Mods, the time has come for me to step back from the day-to-day management of the site. This isn't a decision I've made lightly - far from it - but one I think is in both my and the community's best interests.

I started this project back in 2001, in my bedroom, with a 56k modem, an excitement for the upcoming release of Morrowind and with no grand ambitions or intentions. I didn’t set out to build a business, I just wanted to make a place where modders could share their work without worrying it would vanish into the internet either the next time a fansite went offline or a publisher decided they were done with it. That idea grew legs, sprouted arms, and turned into Nexus Mods.

Since then, this site has been my entire adult life. Every single day, for over two decades, I’ve been "on call", whether it was fixing issues, reading feedback, pushing updates, or getting pulled into the latest bit of community drama. It’s been rewarding, sometimes chaotic, often exhausting and always personal. Somewhere along the way, I forgot to step back and breathe, or sleep properly. The dilemma of running a major social network that does not rest!

The strain of being responsible for the behemoth I created has taken its toll. The stress of the job has been a regular source of anxiety and stress-related health issues. I realised that I have been burning out and this started to have an impact on my staff and Nexus Mods as a whole. So, I firmly believe that the best thing for the future of Nexus Mods is for me to step aside and bring in new leadership to steer the business forward with renewed energy to make Nexus Mods the modding community we all truly deserve.

One of the biggest reasons I've been doing this for so long is that I've never felt that I truly found someone who really "gets" the modding community the way I do. Finding a new owner who would be able to understand and respect the myriad intricacies of both Nexus Mods as a business and the wider modding community was essential. 

After months of meetings, face-to-face talks, and a whole lot of soul searching, I am thrilled to say that I truly believe I have found the exact right people for the task. 

So yes, the ownership of Nexus Mods has changed hands, but I want to be clear, this isn’t some corporate “exit” or a backroom deal. This is me doing something I probably should’ve done years ago: taking care of myself. Reclaiming some headspace. And finally letting go of the idea that I have to do everything and be responsible for everything myself.


What changes now?

Honestly, not a lot, at least not from your side of things.

Behind the scenes, I’ve already been stepping back bit by bit. Over the past few years, the team has taken on more of the weight and the site’s been doing better than ever. What’s changing now is simply the formality of it, making sure the right people are in place to guide Nexus Mods into the next era.

That includes some structural updates to the company ownership that we aren’t shouting about, but I want to be transparent: they’re about long-term stability, not changing the values or direction of the platform. Nexus Mods is community-first and mod-author focused, that’s not up for negotiation.

While I am stepping back, it's important to understand that Nexus Mods isn't just about me and hasn't been for a long time. The Nexus Mods you see today has been created by a team of 40 incredibly dedicated people, some of whom have been here for over 9 years. They live and breathe modding, they care deeply, they’re experienced, committed, and they're very much still here. None of that is changing.

So if I can ask one thing, it’s to continue supporting them, the site, and the community they help nurture every day.

In terms of new faces, you’ll also be seeing more of Foledinho (Victor), Rapsak (Marinus) and Taagen (Nikolai), who’ve come on board to lead this next chapter. They’ve got deep roots in gaming, tech, and most importantly, they give a damn; about the site, the community, and the future we’re trying to build here.

Editor's Note: We've added Nikolai to the new owners listed above. He works more in the background, but is still an important part of the team!

They have my complete trust, and I’m incredibly proud to be bringing them onboard.


What about me?

I’m not disappearing. I’ll still be annoying people on the Mod Author Discord, lurking on the forums, and sticking my nose into community matters when I can’t help myself. I’ll also be working with the team to help guide the overall direction of the site, just without needing to be the person who signs off on every little thing and without taking responsibility for any and all things Nexus Mods.

Frankly, that’s a good thing, for me, for the team, and for the future of Nexus Mods.

708 comments

  1. Foledinho
    Foledinho
    • Site Owner
    • 44 kudos
    Locked
    Sticky
    Hey everyone,

    Thanks for the warm welcome! We’re as excited about Nexus Mods’ future as you are. This post was all about Robin, giving him the credit he truly deserves. He built something incredible, creating a culture that’s shaped gaming and modding as we know it. We're here to honor that legacy and carry it forward, but we need to earn your trust.

    Now, let’s clear the air on a few things:

    Will you sell mods?
    No. Mods will always remain free.
    Will it cost money to download mods? 
    No. Nothing changes here.
    Will you claim ownership of mods uploaded to Nexus Mods? 
    Absolutely not. Mods belong to the creators who create them. No changes will be made. 
    What additional monetization will be added/changed on the site? 
    Monetization is hard and Nexus Mods is a complex platform. What matters most is continuing to support mod authors, delight users, and keep the lights on. We’re not changing the core model. No aggressive monetization. No paid mods. If anything, we’re aiming for fewer ads, not more. We’ll take a community-first, listening approach, and we won’t compromise on what’s made Nexus Mods special.
    Concerns around general statements about early monetisation of games industry start-ups
    Hosting billions of mod files and running the infrastructure behind Nexus Mods isn’t cheap. The site was “monetized early” back in 2007 with premium memberships and honestly, we think it was done right. It enabled healthy growth while supporting the community.We have no plans to change the core of how premium works. It gives users choice based on their needs — and that’s a good thing.Ads? We’re not fans either. They’re a necessary trade-off to keep the site running, but our goal is to reduce them over time, not increase them.
    Will you revoke Lifetime Premium? 
    No. Lifetime Premium means lifetime and it's safe.
    What restrictions are going to be placed on free accounts? 
    None. Free accounts stay as they are.
    Will Robin's hands-on approach be lost? 
    Robin’s legacy remains, and he'll continue to be involved and help guide the overall direction of the platform
    You won’t understand the community’s needs? 
    The Nexus Mods you see today is built by 40 incredibly talented and dedicated people - we’re listening to them, learning fast, and here to support what’s already working.
    You have never made a Skyrim mod - how can you possibly understand us?
    True - we haven’t. But neither did Robin, and he built something amazing. We’re here to listen, learn, and support the people who do — the mod authors and players. That’s how we move forward: together.
    You didn’t mention Chosen in the post - why not?
    This post wasn’t about Chosen — it was about Robin and the legacy he built over 24 years. We’re the new owners and ultimate decision-makers at Nexus Mods. We’ll share more about ourselves when we’ve earned that right. For now, we’re focused on listening, learning, and making modding even easier, and yes, you’ll see us around in the community being active. 

    Trust takes time.

    We're committed to putting control back in the hands of creators, players, and communities. We’ll get back to building now. 

    Marinus, Nikolai and Victor.
  2. Itchytreasuresack
    Itchytreasuresack
    • member
    • 0 kudos
    About the bigoted mods, instead of things just being straight up wrong or right, and good for the environment,
    could we ask the context and reason for a mod.
    (Note that i have no idea about any of this you are talking about, i did not see any of these mods most of you are arguing about.)

    If i was playing a game where the character is white and i can't play anyone else and its a roleplaying game, and I'm a black girl in real life, and i can mod, i might want to make a mod changing my character to be female and black. this in my view would be ok the reasons are not bigoted,

    But than what if a moderator comes to ask me why i made the mod, and i simply don't respond or am in a bad mood or just don't have good social skills, and give a vague answer that does not make it clear the reasons to why and it's context, maybe if i was a moderator i would want to kick it down.

    About the flag, i have no idea about this flag, did not see the mod, don't know what you are saying.
    But if i have a flag any flag, in my game and it is reminding me of anything in real life i don't feel comfortable with for what ever reason or i just think it is ugly, in the way, or being spammed in the game too much.(this hypothetical would be for a non bigoted human being).

    Than i might just want to mod it to change it somehow to what ever i would think would be more pleasant, and i might share it cos i would think people would have the same thought, than again, i would refer to the case i made about moderation above, to this part of the comment, and again,
    if not enough reason and context was given and it was not clear enough that i was making it for a legitimate reason with no bigoted grounds, as a moderator i might take it down for looking like it is bigoted.

    I have no idea how things work around here. i am a newb mostly using nexus for 20 years but for moding, i have no conversations and i don't read posts.

    So to summarise
    , instead of things in this world being seen as right or wrong immediately, instead, mods being an overall art form, they are subjective to opinions and opinions and ideals are relative, but we do not like bigotry and hate etc, that's for sure, but do we also like freedom? than we must ask the art creators for the logic, the point, the reason, and understand the creator's truth of the why things are made.

    And modders, would have to be responsible fully formed dudes, that can give coherent responses that satisfy the nexus staff and give a perfect insight in to why things are made.

    As a side note: this is just my opinion, i don't really like how most people think its right or wrong, no, its a middle ground. it depends on why things are made, if they are not plain out hateful like right away, i think we should get it straight before we judge the mate making them.

    I also think a lot of you have really good points, like someone said that if you let one hate mod come in than they all start coming in, maybe you are right.
    But i still think what would really be fair would be to get the reasons for the mods and make conscious decisions before bans.
    But def hide mods that seem offensive until they are proven non offensive.

    Sorry i am boring everyone with more gigantic comments,

    I wish the new owners the best of luck in taking over the world, of the nexus.
    Thank you for letting people have discussions in here, although i find it strange, maybe we did need this lol.
    1. SlayerTheChikken
      SlayerTheChikken
      • premium
      • 3 kudos
      You are right, the context of a mod matters, it's not all hateful. There's a balance to be had, and the extremism needs to go away if it's present.
    2. WileCoyote68
      WileCoyote68
      • premium
      • 152 kudos
      First of all, a mod is just a mod with which the mod author changes something in a game that the game does not offer. If the motivation behind it is not clearly provocative or discriminatory, it is perfectly legitimate. How it is interpreted and evaluated by others should be irrelevant. There will always be people who see something that isn't there.

      If game developers only give players one choice and thereby try to foist a certain message on them, then in my opinion that is simply bad game design.
    3. Itchytreasuresack
      Itchytreasuresack
      • member
      • 0 kudos
      I agree that is a flaw in my logic WileCoyote68, i did think of that. Also, well put.
      But i believe a bunch of dudes figuring out if the reason is legitimate and actually asking about it and getting a response,
      Is the fair way to go and will probably work best.

      I'm talking nexus staff, maybe selected for being optimal for this kind of decision making.

      Maybe it is not perfect, but it might be close to perfect :P
      Better that i think, than using a logic to ban or leave unbanned certain things depending on what it does without asking the modder about his true intentions and making a thought out decision before deciding the ban/removal.

      Because it might be art after all, it might have taken a lot of care, love, hard work and time to make, and maybe it was in the nicest loveliest interest/intention.
    4. TheMadTemplar
      TheMadTemplar
      • premium
      • 9 kudos
      "If game developers only give players one choice and thereby try to foist a certain message on them"

      That's a flawed argument. It's the argument used by the bigoted who complain about a black woman in their game, or a gay man, or whatever that isn't a straight white male. The existence of those people is not a message. Their inclusion in a game is not a message. Their existence as a playable character is not a message. The existence of anyone other than straight white men or women who strictly conform to more traditional gender roles is not a message. 


      But even if it were, even if developers put a message into their game, why is that bad? Games have been statements for several decades now. Other media even longer. 
    5. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "If the motivation behind it is not clearly provocative or discriminatory, it is perfectly legitimate. "

      LOL, "If we HIDE the bigotry well enough, you should allow it!".

      LOL no. 

      Once again, that is not how any of this works my guy. 

      ... also, I wonder what the EU has to say about it?

      "Hatred not only affects the individual victims, it represents a threat to vibrant democracies and a pluralistic society.Hate motivated crime and speech are illegal under EU law. The 2008 Framework Decision on combating certain forms of expressions of racism and xenophobia requires the criminalisation of public incitement to violence or hatred based on race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin. "

      ... ... ... oop. 
    6. Itchytreasuresack
      Itchytreasuresack
      • member
      • 0 kudos
      Nice point AleniaVamp2000, although i did not feel that was what he meant, your interpretation makes sense and it could be turned to that direction, but his statement is also true, when WileCoyote68 says "If the motivation behind it is not clearly provocative or discriminatory, it is perfectly legitimate"

      For example, a mod is made that is clearly not to be racist but it so happens that it touches the race subject, would be "perfectly legitimate", but now a bunch of racists are downloading it for racist reasons, that could happen or maybe that was the intention all along, i guess we would not really be able to discover that, it would be "hidden enough".

      So his statement is true, but what you say is also true and brings  an excellent point to what i have said here. What if people hide their hateful mods behind a sane non bigoted logic and it gets past the "filter", what if they are good at hiding the true intentions of their content.

      I still think the solution would be to just trust some dudes that are really good at discerning intentions and what is art and what is not, and have them make good decisions on a good solid basis.

      Thanks for commenting on my comment lol.
    7. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      The thing is, intent cannot be the only metric. If you are causing harm to a community, even if that is not your stated intention, you are still causing harm.

      You can accidentally unalive someone and still go to jail for manslaughter. Intent is CLEARLY not the only factor that needs to be considered.

      (Also, you can lie about intent. As someone who has had to engage with right-leaning trolls for the better part of two decades, they will twist language, move goal posts, and just blatantly lie to get their way. Like they have been doing all over this announcement, trying to bully and strong-arm the new owners into allowing their filth straight away.)
    8. Itchytreasuresack
      Itchytreasuresack
      • member
      • 0 kudos
      This is all very relative, and cases should be treated as unique instances, not bagged together.

      I agree with your statement AleniaVamp2000, but i will now ramble on about it. :P

      You would never have any art at all, absolutely nothing, if there was censorship that simply bans something because it seems to harm a community. Anything can seem to harm any community, just needs a guy/gal to interpret it that way and share his opinion with the rest. That could not be the basis for a fair system, an artist should be entitled to do his "crazy" thing even if it pushes a few buttons, if the true intent is never to harm. A lot of art is made with the sole purpose of inciting feelings, conversations, discussions they have a provocative nature but the intent is not bad, it is the opposite, it is trying to bring about change through thought.

      Ofc the interpretation of some people can be that it harms, but if that is not its intent and 50 people can see that, and like the piece, do we bend to favour the will of another 50 people that think it's harmful and deprive the first 50 of the piece they enjoy?
      (ofc i am not taking in to account here that people that don't like things tend to be a lot more vocal than people who like things, but this is just a comment i don't need to go that deep)

      For 100 years we are using groups of humans to decide what should be censored and not. it is a flawed system but it kinda works.
      Using tv as an example, we have channels that let artists get away with more and the results sometimes is fantastic art pieces that makes us super happy, and tv shows that get completely censored and the whole idea and the show itself falls apart.

      Art is by nature pretty wild, than the interpretation of anyone, can put any piece of art in a situation where it looks bad, but really i think what truly matters is what the artist thinks the piece means, (and to be honest if he/she doesn't want to say why, that is actually legit) as long as it's not something that clearly sounds hateful or horrible to the general population.
      And thus the "censors" do their thing and make sure things make sense by their standards,(that should represent most of the general publics opinion) that we will just have to trust.

      And as a community we will in time decide if we like their decisions or not, but the voice of the few should never out weight the voice of the many(just because they are more vocal), and the freedom of one should not trample the freedom of another. Most of us have a basic common notion that we do not want hate based content around, but if we go too far we might castrate artists trying to make genuine pieces, they will no longer feel free to make what they want, if they feel they might get shut down for it looking like something that it is not.

      I am sorry... I write a lot...
    9. jmateo1990
      jmateo1990
      • premium
      • 1 kudos
      People being upset about mods is the wildest thing I have ever heard. Just don't use them. Once you start banning things that people find offensive, everything is subject to being offensive. It's either All or nothing. 
    10. nightx87
      nightx87
      • supporter
      • 1 kudos
      this 100%.

      anything you do , no matter what will ALWAYS get someone either offended or mad. even if it's none of their business and doesn't impact them directly. you cannot expect art or any other kind of stuff, mods included to appeal or even be okay with EVERYONE. there will ALWAYS be someone unhappy in one way or another that will be more vocal than the ones happy about it and you cannot get rid of something because a small part of the user base is throwing a tantrum. censorship and choking creativity is never gonna be the answer. if anything , it'll fuel more extreme takes and art pieces as protest. i think everyone no matter what political side they're on should be able to express their creativity as long as it doesn't cross any lines such as openly directed racism , sexism , hate or  violence ( these works in every ways no matter who it's directed at).
    11. WileCoyote68
      WileCoyote68
      • premium
      • 152 kudos
      LOL, "If we HIDE the bigotry well enough, you should allow it!".
      The way you interpret this statement alone shows me how pointless it is to engage in conversation with people like you. It's all about hatred and incitement in your minds. Even if you are unable to define exactly what that is supposed to be. We experience all this every day and have seen it a thousand times before. You have no other arguments for people who do not agree with your point of view. Framing and name calling is not based on facts; it is simply an expression of the feelings you have toward others.

      "If you are causing harm to a community, even if that is not your stated intention, you are still causing harm."
      If someone uploads a mod without stating their intention in any way, you simply assume that their intention is bad. That's how this mindset works.

      "That's a flawed argument. It's the argument used by the bigoted who complain about a black woman in their game, or a gay man, or whatever that isn't a straight white male. The existence of those people is not a message. Their inclusion in a game is not a message. Their existence as a playable character is not a message. The existence of anyone other than straight white men or women who strictly conform to more traditional gender roles is not a message."
      That must be the reason why games like Dustborn exist, or why Dragon Age: The Veilguard teaches us what good and immoral behavior is.

      "But even if it were, even if developers put a message into their game, why is that bad? Games have been statements for several decades now. Other media even longer. "
      I play to be entertained, not to receive a lesson in good behavior. When I play games, I am not interested in the daily problems of the real world in any way. I want to switch off for a while, forget my worries, and just have fun. No one has anything against games whose stories raise philosophical questions, if the story behind them is coherent, as is the case with Cyberpunk 2077, for example. That's what distinguishes good storytelling from bad. I can make my own decisions that influence the course of the story in some way. Nothing must happen, but anything can happen. That's also why games like Mass Effect have stuck in players' memories. It's all about the decisions you make. Nowadays, virtual signaling is unfortunately more important than good storytelling.
    12. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "If someone uploads a mod without stating their intention in any way, you simply assume that their intention is bad. That's how this mindset works."

      YOU want the metric to be "Intent over effect" because it gives you cart blanch to make any ugly thing you want, then say "But I didn't *mean* for my Not-See Flag mod to be offensive!" and force Nexus to keep it up. Hence why it is a bad metric to make decisions with. 

      If you make a mod that is bigoted, *EVEN IF YOU DON'T PERSONALLY SEE IT AS SUCH*, Nexus has every right to take that mod down, no matter what your personal intent might have been. Full stop. 

      Luckily for us, the EU has pretty strong laws about exactly this, and Im pretty sure out new owners are not gonna make their first move "Get the EU all up in our butts for hosting bigotry!" 
    13. BlackPaisley128
      BlackPaisley128
      • premium
      • 1 kudos
      @AleniaVamp2000 You're wasting your time with WileCoyote. Dude has been making bad faith arguments and trying to act like a contrarian since yesterday. Even the text in his 'About Me' should give a general idea on the type of person he is lmao.
    14. BlackPaisley128
      BlackPaisley128
      • premium
      • 1 kudos
      "When I play games, I am not interested in the daily problems of the real world in any way"

      >Mentions a game that's heavily about capitalism and its impact on society.
    15. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      @BlackPaisley128 oh, I know, none of the folks screaming about letting bigotry have a place here are arguing in good faith... I just refuse to let them over-run the conversation with the BS, because it's so easy to prove its BS lol. 

      (engaging and disarming right wing trolls is a reflex at this point... They like to make it seem like they are the majority, and use things like second accounts to puff up their presence, so that their platform of bigotry seems more popular or more "Right" than it actually is... and they do that by sucking all the air out of the room till most people just exit the convo, then they claim the "Won". Wellllllll, not on my watch lol) 
    16. WileCoyote68
      WileCoyote68
      • premium
      • 152 kudos
      And it continues with framing and name calling. Put on a different record, this one is worn out.
    17. CelestialStarmie
      CelestialStarmie
      • supporter
      • 6 kudos
      AleniaVamp has been commenting non-stop for hours, seems they are just looking for reactions here. Ignore the terminally online, you're right only in that they can't prove the intention of a mod, but that doesn't matter since even if one person is deeply offended by your content, it's still valid and you should be punished for it. That's how the law works in most countries.

      Ignore and block all people using left and right wing comments, this people just like sticking labels on others and enjoy the scent of their own importance.
    18. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "And it continues with framing and name calling. "

      Oh! A chance to point out one of your escalation techniques! And it's one of my favorites! Dehumanization!

      By calling me "It", you are attempting to bait me in two ways: To start en exchange about my gender (In which you will claim Im trans in some way, trying to discredit and insult me) and/or attempting to spin the conversation into gender essentialism, which is so far beyond the scope of this thread, it will get turned off. 

      So, what name did I call you again? Cause Im calling out "General Bigots", and for that to be relevant to you, you would have to self-identify as one. 
    19. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "AleniaVamp has been commenting non-stop for hours, "

      Oh, is there a post limit rule Im unaware of? Link it and I will comply post-haste! Don't wanna be a rule-breaker :)
    20. WileCoyote68
      WileCoyote68
      • premium
      • 152 kudos
      "By calling me "It", you are attempting to bait me in two ways: To start en exchange about my gender (In which you will claim Im trans in some way, trying to discredit and insult me) and/or attempting to spin the conversation into gender essentialism, which is so far beyond the scope of this thread, it will get turned off."

      What an excellent example of interpreting something that isn't there. “It” refers to the matter at hand, not to you personally. I couldn't care less what gender you are or which gender you identify with. You're just revealing how you tick and how you think.
    21. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "What an excellent example of interpreting something that isn't there. “It” refers to the matter at hand, not to you personally. I couldn't care less what gender you are or which gender you identify with. You're just revealing how you tick and how you think."

      *Sniff*

      I do love the smell of plausible deniability in the afternoon. But that is just awfully off topic.

      So, how you feeling about how the EU frames this issue?

      (This part in particular?)


      "Hate motivated crime and speech are illegal under EU law. The 2008 Framework Decision on combating certain forms of expressions of racism and xenophobia requires the criminalisation of public incitement to violence or hatred based on race, colour, religion, descent or national or ethnic origin."
    22. WileCoyote68
      WileCoyote68
      • premium
      • 152 kudos
      Since this is only your interpretation of my comment, I am not interested in it in any way.
  3. Chopper0130
    Chopper0130
    • member
    • 0 kudos
    You'll be missed. I've been here since the begining, and I've watched this place turn in to one of the best modding and respected communities on the web. Take care and remember to drop in now and then and lets us know you're still out there enjoying life.
    1. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      I said it yesterday, and I'll say it again: I hope they spend this summer chillin at a beach with a mojito and a good book LOL
  4. 00cobra00
    00cobra00
    • member
    • 2 kudos
    Nexus is a PRIVATE business. That means the business owners can determine what content they do or do not want on THEIR website. Within the law, of course.

    Each Nexus account creator EXPLICITLY agrees to Terms of Service conditions. Those conditions EXPLICITLY state what you can and cannot publish on this PRIVATE business' website.

    What the Terms of Service DO NOT apply to:

    - How YOU choose to think.

    - How YOU choose to interpret the world.

    - What content HOSTED OUTSIDE OF NEXUSMODS.COM YOU PRIVATELY choose to implement in YOUR games on YOUR own PRIVATE electronic device(s).

    That is the end of it.

    There is nothing further to litigate within the purview of the relationship between the site, site content, and site account owners. Stop deliberately obfuscating. Stop moving the goalposts because you get a definitive, unequivocal answer you do not agree with. Stop the whataboutisms. Stop the bad faith arguments, the logical fallacies.

    In the context of this very basic, boilerplate relationship between you, the Nexus account creator, and Nexus, a PRIVATE business, when it comes to mods:

    - What political stance you think the website leans towards is IRRELEVANT.

    - What you think is right or wrong is IRRELEVANT.

    - What you think is fair or unfair is IRRELEVANT.

    You want to know why?

    Start reading from the top.
    1. BlackPaisley128
      BlackPaisley128
      • premium
      • 1 kudos
      This comment should be pinned.
    2. chrissarmss2
      chrissarmss2
      • premium
      • 0 kudos
      I agree, this comment should be pinned for everyone to read.
      the fact that nexus mods is free for anyone to use and upload to is a blessing. this site is a privilege for everyone who uses it, it didn't have to be here, they could have stopped supporting it long ago but they didn't. people need to stop acting so entitled and accept that this website is for everyone to enjoy and for the owners to manage how they see fit
      , to the end.
    3. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      It indeed does need to be pinned!
    4. PinkyDude
      PinkyDude
      • premium
      • 1,661 kudos
      Bumping this comment! and I just wanna add into it;

      It's been two days now - I'm not sure what's the point of keeping this post unlocked anymore, especially since the majority of conversations pivoted to "talks" (complains) about "censorship" and "unfair moderation" (also considering it has been locked two, three times already) I think, maybe, it would be wise to adress it directly and open a proper discussion on this matter once and for all, in another post dedicated to this topic? Would make it easier for moderators to keep track of actual feedback on the new ownership on this post :)

      One thing is clear, a lot of people feel strong about the topic of "censorship" and tolerance (or lack thereof) while simultaneously not understanding it (and doing nothing to understand it either). They are entitled to their own opinions, bias and emotions, but a lot of people fail to grasp that their opinions, our opinions, doesn't matter at all; we all signed up on Nexus, meaning we all should be aware of the TOS and rules - they're the one who decided to ignore the clearly stated "warning signs" when signing up.

      If, tomorrow, Nexus decides to do a 180°, update their TOS and ban LGBTQ+ content while keeping bigoted and nazi mods, we wouldn't be able to do anything about it; I'm sure a lot of the people currently screaming about equality and censorship would scream Victory and flip their fingers at "the other side" (because why would they tolerate the people they keep removing from their games, right?)


      Now as a general reminder: People's lives, sexuality and skin colors are not political.
      Getting sick and tired of seeing this word being thrown around - "keep politics out of games" - as if the games we love aren't filled with ACTUAL political stories. Call it what it really is; Minorities. You don't want minorities in your games. You want the freedom of erasing us, modding us out, the freedom of shoving your mod and opinion into everyone's face on a big platform and you don't want to get hit with the concequences of doing so. THIS is what this whole mess is really all about.

      "It's just a mod, you don't have to download it and you can hide it, what's the issue?"
      The issue is that minorities, Black people, Gay people, are still being murdered and killed to this day, in 2025. We are still being killed, tortured and hate-crimed DAILY for just being ourselves. Seeing people being so proud of themselves for erasing us in games, publishing their mods for everyone to see, waiting to be pated on the back and coddled in their opinions is upseting, it is hurtful. To block something, we still have to see it, see how much download the mod has, see how many people agree with your opinion, with your hatred. Seeing 'straight white men' saying they feel equally "victimized" by mods including a pride flag or changing the skintone of a white character to a darker tone, as if they were persecuted all their lives for being 'white straight men' is making me SICK.

      This whole comment section should be used as a reason as to WHY Nexus needs to STAY the way it is. We need inclusivity more than ever, especially in today's political climate, and it's truly sad and infuriating that so many people fail to realize that.
    5. roughsleeper
      roughsleeper
      • member
      • 0 kudos
      PIN THIS

      Agreed. It is indeed a tough one.
      NM must work within the framework of the Law.
      T&C's explain everything, so don't expect them to bat for every side because they can't.
      IMO: If your Mod won't get them in legal trouble, it should be allowed.
    6. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "Now as a general reminder: People's lives, sexuality and skin colors are not political.
      Getting sick and tired of seeing this word being thrown around - "keep politics out of games" - as if the games we love aren't filled with ACTUAL political stories. Call it what it really is; Minorities. You don't want minorities in your games. You want the freedom of erasing us, modding us out, the freedom of shoving your mod and opinion into everyone's face on a big platform and you don't want to get hit with the concequences of doing so. THIS is what this whole mess is really all about."

      Yep. This. 100% THIS
    7. dyingstar101
      dyingstar101
      • member
      • 1 kudos
       finally... someone with common sense!
    8. AndrewLRG
      AndrewLRG
      • member
      • 0 kudos
      What a horrible advice. "I don't care what you want! I don't care what you think! I'm in charge and I will do as I see fit! And if you "bigots" don't like it, then get the F out!" That type of thinking is exactly why Western entertainment industry in where it is right now. You can't talk to your clients/consumers/visitors like that.
    9. BlackPaisley128
      BlackPaisley128
      • premium
      • 1 kudos
      That's where you're wrong, Andrew. Lmao.
    10. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "What a horrible advice. "I don't care what you want! I don't care what you think! I'm in charge and I will do as I see fit! And if you "bigots" don't like it, then get the F out!" That type of thinking is exactly why Western entertainment industry in where it is right now. You can't talk to your clients/consumers/visitors like that."

      Um... or, you could just not be a bigot? Or keep that bigotry off this particular website, and to yourself?

      It's super easy, watch: 

      *Thinks bigoted thoughts*
      *Keeps them to myself cause Nexus will just take them down anyway*
      *?Profit?* 
  5. Codus3289
    Codus3289
    • premium
    • 0 kudos
    Yeah I still cancelled me premium subscription because I can't think of ONE mega corp buying another company that hasn't turned it into some capitalistic money vacuum that ends up going bankrupt because the people in charge think their bank account is their IQ. IF in a couple years Nexus isn't another burning corpse of NFTs with dipshit CEO's huddled around trying to suck out the last of its marrow I MIGHT resub. I guess we'll see if they aren't lying. (Spoiler Alert: they probably are) I'm going to save a screen shot of this so when the inevitable happens I can have a nice hardy "I told you so." Ready to go. Have a nice day.
  6. Elianora
    Elianora
    • premium
    • 13,295 kudos
    Appreciate the update! And as an LGBTQIA+ mod author I appreciate the reassurance that this will remain a place free of hatred, trolling and discrimination <3
    1. brandiuntz
      brandiuntz
      • premium
      • 56 kudos
      Exactly. I hope the Nexus continues to be a safe place for all minorities.
    2. wxMichael
      wxMichael
      • premium
      • 105 kudos
      Tolerance and inclusion isn't compatible with identity-based hate and discrimination.
      🟥 🟧 🟨 🟩 🟦 🟪
    3. PinkyDude
      PinkyDude
      • premium
      • 1,661 kudos
      Glad to see more level-headed people speaking up.

      There is no "censorship" happening on Nexus Mods.
      The moment you create an account on their platform, you agree to their rules and TOS, which includes their File Submission guidelines

      Inappropriate Content:
      Content that may be generally construed as provocative, divisive, objectionable, discriminatory, or abusive toward any real-world individual or group, may be subject to moderation. This includes but is not limited to content involving politics, race, religion, gender identity, sexuality, or social class.

      TL:DR - "Don't publish bigoted mods on our platform or we'll have to remove it." 

      Don't agree with these rules? NexusMods might not be for you then. 
    4. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "The moment you create an account on their platform, you agree to their rules and TOS"

      *Chefs Kiss* 
    5. SlayerTheChikken
      SlayerTheChikken
      • premium
      • 3 kudos
      I love your mods Eli, eventually I'll get to playing skyrim again in my gigantic Bethesda loop <__> and then I will arrive at breezehome once again
    6. brianj64
      brianj64
      • supporter
      • 3 kudos
      Ah yeah, but you forget to say that inappropriate content from a certain ideology is being turned a blind eye to, while others are being removed. If you don't even uphold your own TOS...

      Look at Twitch, a dying platform, because all they do is alienate their userbase.
    7. AleniaVamp2000
      AleniaVamp2000
      • premium
      • 24 kudos
      "If you don't do that, Nexus Mods will eventually die and some other more Libre site will take over."

      I think what you might not fathom is that... the people who wanna be bigots ARE the minority of users on Nexus. And Nexus has NO reason to cater to them, because the folks that are NOT bigots are who would leave if they start allowing it... and they outnumber the bigots 5 to 1 conservatively.

      Also (again) this site is operating under the EU now... and they have pretty strict laws that would get Nexus taken down if they started hosting those kinds of mods. So no... they do NOT need to do that. That would be bad LOL
  7. MrChaos333
    MrChaos333
    • premium
    • 2 kudos
    I've been using Nexusmods since the start and truly appreciate your hard work. You were fair and gave us a heads-up when the offer of lifetime subscriptions was ending. It was unusual to say the least. Thank you!
  8. The fact that Chosen wasn't even mentioned as being the new owner of Nexus feels like something done in bad faith. It feels like you were trying to hide something from the community because you wanted to avoid outrage and controversy. And the fact the new admins say they feel they can't talk about themselves until they've "earned the right" doesn't fill me with confidence. What does "earning the right" to share something about yourself even mean?

    If you care about the community, want to be a part of it, and earn our trust as you so claim, then you need to be transparent and upfront about these things. Because being secretive isn't going to help users trust you. In fact, it makes them less likely to trust you, because now you have half the community thinking they need to download every mod on the site because now they're worried some sort of aggressive, and intrusive monetization will happen to it. 

    And while you claim nothing will change, I have a hard time believing that. Again, you talk about earning our trust, but the new owner was not disclosed to the users and was only discovered after other forums did some digging, the new admins said they feel they *couldn't* talk about themselves. So, tell me. Why should the community trust you? You've certainly given us no reason to. If you were at least up front and honest about Chosen being the new owner, I'd still have my doubts, but I'd at least respect the transparency. But no such effort was made. You're basically just saying "trust us." 
  9. monmoncat
    monmoncat
    • premium
    • 0 kudos
    until this private equity firm proves they aren't going to ruin the site, I'm no longer paying for it. cancelled 
    1. Zanderat
      Zanderat
      • premium
      • 253 kudos
      That'll show them!
    2. monmoncat
      monmoncat
      • premium
      • 0 kudos
      always needs to be an eager defender lol

      it quite literally will show them if they're losing subs
  10. rsbeckwell
    rsbeckwell
    • member
    • 0 kudos
    Best wishes on your next endeavor.  I have been a member since 2/2009 and am very appreciative of your efforts.  The future can be daunting at times, but it can also be exciting as to the prospects.  Power on and may you have smooth sailing.
  11. Slideshot
    Slideshot
    • member
    • 0 kudos
    Thank you for the many years of effort you put in for everyone!